<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome To The Tech Podcast Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rawvoice.com/2007/05/24/welcome-to-the-tech-podcast-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rawvoice.com/2007/05/24/welcome-to-the-tech-podcast-party/</link>
	<description>Instant Media Communities</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Claude Gelinas</title>
		<link>http://blog.rawvoice.com/2007/05/24/welcome-to-the-tech-podcast-party/#comment-2801</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Gelinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 05:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rawvoice.com/2007/05/24/welcome-to-the-tech-podcast-party/#comment-2801</guid>
		<description>John C. Dvorak will be to the tech podcasting world what Howard Stern is (in his better days) to commercial radio.

He's got opinions on just about everything that beeps and blinks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John C. Dvorak will be to the tech podcasting world what Howard Stern is (in his better days) to commercial radio.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s got opinions on just about everything that beeps and blinks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blog.rawvoice.com/2007/05/24/welcome-to-the-tech-podcast-party/#comment-2800</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rawvoice.com/2007/05/24/welcome-to-the-tech-podcast-party/#comment-2800</guid>
		<description>We're well aware of John's presence on TWIT. It has been a good move, in spite of his past opinions, to embrace the blogging and podcasting community.

The general welcome to the party is for PodShow. Although PodShow has a couple of high profile tech shows I think this is the first time they have staked a claim on the tech vertical.

The interest in the space is great. We think that podcasting is growing at a nice rate. As more traditional media skeptic types move into the space everyone benefits from the exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re well aware of John&#8217;s presence on TWIT. It has been a good move, in spite of his past opinions, to embrace the blogging and podcasting community.</p>
<p>The general welcome to the party is for PodShow. Although PodShow has a couple of high profile tech shows I think this is the first time they have staked a claim on the tech vertical.</p>
<p>The interest in the space is great. We think that podcasting is growing at a nice rate. As more traditional media skeptic types move into the space everyone benefits from the exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.rawvoice.com/2007/05/24/welcome-to-the-tech-podcast-party/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 16:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rawvoice.com/2007/05/24/welcome-to-the-tech-podcast-party/#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>Todd,
Dvorak's been doing Cranky Geeks and guesting on TWIT for about a year now.  I'd hardly say he's just entering the space.

As far as his comments go, he's all about generating controversy, which gets him attention, bringing more traffic to his site, or more purchases of magazines and books with his articles in them.  

He's completely hit-and-miss with his comments and predictions.  Being generous, I'd say he's about 35% hit, and 65% miss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,<br />
Dvorak&#8217;s been doing Cranky Geeks and guesting on TWIT for about a year now.  I&#8217;d hardly say he&#8217;s just entering the space.</p>
<p>As far as his comments go, he&#8217;s all about generating controversy, which gets him attention, bringing more traffic to his site, or more purchases of magazines and books with his articles in them.  </p>
<p>He&#8217;s completely hit-and-miss with his comments and predictions.  Being generous, I&#8217;d say he&#8217;s about 35% hit, and 65% miss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
